On Turning Pro

Um, it’s all gone slightly insane in portfolio-land. I’m up 26.5% this year and it’s only the end of March. The total cumulative performance is 129.9% since inception (17.9% annualised), and 80.8% since the end of March 2009. For comparison, the FTSE 100 with dividends reinvested is up 39.6% (6.8% annualised) since the same start date (10 March 2005) and is up 50.7% since the end of March 2009.

Well, maybe I’m due a ‘correction’, or maybe value investing with a concentrated portfolio of undervalued securities is a smart way to compound capital. The great thing about blogging for the past 16 months is that it records some of the thoughts going through my head during the period, thus avoiding the perrenial problems of hindsight bias.

A few further statistics worth noting are that of the 16 securities I owned over the period, just 9 were sold for, or are currently showing, a profit. Of the total monetary gains, 91% have come from 3 securities (32% Berkshire, 17% Hallin Marine and 42% Lo-Q). The maximum percentage loss was a 49% loss in RBS, but this only comprised 2% of the total P/L over the period. When I really liked something I bet big and when I wasn’t sure I bet small.

In a world of mixed fortunes I’m now working as a professional again, 7 years after first starting out as an Equity Analyst but with over a 5 year gap during the period. I feel pretty much self-taught, although working at a small fund a while ago certainly taught me a lot about investing in general and investing in the stock market in particular. I wonder how much use the leveraged global-macro betting was in coming to terms with my fallibility, a lot I suspect. It also taught me a great deal about how markets react to news and the various capital flows that ebb and flow over the credit cycle.

Whilst it’s great to be working again, I can’t just buy and sell for my own account as I might like to any more. I also have a lot less time to look at small-cap shares as I’m spending it looking at larger stocks at work. I’m learning a great deal from some guys with loads more experience than I have, and the game has changed somewhat as the size of shares to look at has grown.

Whilst I can simply read a set of financial statements and feel I have an edge on other market participants with the smaller £10m or so companies, it’s going to take an awful lot more work to feel like I have an edge (most of the time) while looking at £500m and upwards companies. Suddenly the market is far more efficient and effectively smarter. This is not all bad, as reasons for a re-rating should be uncovered faster, but the ultimate goal of maximising post-tax returns is simply a lot harder when investing tens of millions over tens of thousands of pounds.

By way of completion, I did say I’d post my portfolio up here with prices and so on. It’s moved around a bit since I said that but the current situation is as follows:

Stock........Price Paid......Current Price........% Value in Portfolio
LOQ.............£0.80.................£1.21..............................59%
MTEC..........£2.03................£2.22..............................17%
EMG............£2.05................£2.42................................7%
WMH...........£1.62.................£2.11................................4%
GMG.............£1.57................£0.98...............................2%
(Cash)...........................................................................11%

If I were starting from scratch I may have similar holdings, but weighted something along the lines of 50/20/10/10/10 (%-weight in the order of stocks listed above). In fact, Lo-Q isn’t looking quite so attractive any more as the price has risen, although it’s still reasonably cheap and my other ideas for inclusion aren’t so great or developed at the moment, so there’s no need to sell just yet.

As a final note, I’m happy to think that you can still pick up the odd bargain in the mid-cap pool of stocks. Game Group is a great business; the market leader in its niche in almost all its territories. The earnings are strongly cyclical, and Myopic Mr Market has some trouble looking more than 12 months ahead, so it’s selling at around a 60% discount to its fair value. I could well be wrong on this, as the world of tomorrow won’t look like the world of yesterday, but at least I feel I have a Variant Perception. Hopefully they’ll be dishing out some more profit warnings soon and the market will become even more depressed and the bargain even more attractively priced for all the long-term value investors out there.

On Market Inefficiencies

Where could be better to dig for an overlooked gem of a business than in the small-cap space? Nowhere as far as I'm concerned. This does not mean that there aren't bargains to be found in other areas of the markets, but the glaring inefficiencies in the form of undervalued assets are far more likely to be found where nobody is looking.

An efficient market is likely to have a relative balance of potential buyers and sellers and relatively little emotion from those participants. Thus the larger anomalies of market peaks and troughs coincide with maximum optimism and pessimism in market participants. Where more eyes are fixed on a given security, ultimately its price is going to be closer to its intrinsic value. In general, markets may not be precisely right all the time, but they are approximately right most of the time.

So, where a stock has very few followers, and relatively little understanding of its products out there in the investment community, you're more likely to find something significantly mis-priced than in the over-analysed world of large-cap investing.

Take Lo-Q. I first came across this stock when a friend told me about her family's outing to Legoland Windsor. The family had used a 'Q-bot' device to avoid having to physically queue for popular rides for the day. The device sounded a bit clunky, but the basic service of cutting down physical queuing times struck me immediately as something that society at large would happily pay a decent price for. The other great thing was that remote queuing remained 'fair' to everyone as you had to pay for the service and you joined the queue with the same waiting time as if you had joined the physical queue.

The next morning a technology sector stock screen at work showed the business trading at a very, very low price versus its prior year's earnings and cash on the balance sheet. For some reason the market thought that a business growing at 20%+ a year with £2m of cash and £2m of pre-tax profits (for the prior year) was worth around £10m. Fair enough if that profit level is illusory, but I felt it was certainly worth a little investigation.

Well, 6 months on and there is now over £4m in cash, still no debt, pre-tax profits are at £2.4m and the market cap still reflects a high degree of scepticism in the business model at £13.5m. To be fair the clearing price may actually be higher than the market cap as the brokers won't sell me as many shares as I want to buy - my first taste of the annoyance of illiquidity issues in small-cap investing.

Anyway, it probably helps that I learned the business has survived the attempts of over 20 competitors (all of whom have failed) over the years, but I found this out from a simple phone call. I honestly quite often wonder if many investors go to the trouble of reading an annual report (or even the balance sheet and income statement) before they invest in businesses sometimes. I certainly don't know many private investors who take even 5 minutes to do just that. Peter Lynch once lamented when asked what investors should look for in a stock, "Well, they could start by looking for some profits!”

So, as institutions can’t operate with much less than £20m, say, in assets (1% of which is hardly going to do much more than turn the lights on in The City), any business trading for much less than £50m or so is just going to have fewer people following it. And brokers see no value in producing research on a stock if institutional investors aren’t churning their portfolios through them. So you get some tiny companies growing at astonishing rates, valued as if they about to slide into an imminent decline.

Of course it may just be that you have missed something, but if you’ve done your homework and still think you’ve found a bargain, chances are that you are correct. As Mr Buffett says, “You’re neither right nor wrong because other people agree with you. You’re right because your facts are right and your reasoning is right – and that’s the only thing that makes you right. And if your facts and reasoning are right, you don’t have to worry about anybody else.”

On Myopic Mr Market

Well, the market is fluctuating, which isn't much of a surprise. Every day events cause the prices of thousands of securities to gyrate with dizzying velocity. Perhaps the 'fundamentals' are moving at the same breakneck speed, and the value of all future cash flows is being efficiently priced in from minute to minute, and day to day. Or perhaps not.

With so many people excessively concerned with the next quarter's numbers for the company they have their eyes on that day, it's no wonder that stocks move in such manic-depressive swings. Frankly, it's unlikely that a company such as Man Group was correctly priced at £3bn in March 2009, £6bn in November 2009 and now at £4bn again in January 2010. This is, of course, quite good news if you are able to stay focussed on the long-term in your outlook.

Taking the view that companies are very rarely correctly priced by the markets seems the only rational explanation to me of why share prices move so wildly over a one year period or so. The fact that they can fall 3-5% in a day if they narrowly miss forecasted quarterly numbers, seems rather short-term biased to me. And it creates a nice opportunity for people to effectively profit from the short-termism of the market and it's gyrating prices.

Man Group (EMG) is a good example. I first took a good look at the business in the summer of 2008. Back then the company was valued at £8-10bn by the market, and there were some serious problems brewing with respect to redemptions and the future for the hedge fund industry in general. My view was that if any hedge funds survive, Man should be one of them as it's very well run by nice and dull looking accountants and lawyers (this is meant as a compliment!).

That view hasn't changed, but redemptions appeared to stabilise with the markets in general during 2009. Next came some unfortunately poor performance over the year within their flagship AHL fund. But that's one bad year in a string of performance that is quite astonishing over a far longer period of 18 years or so.

So, now you're faced with some relatively bad results for the quarter, the year and maybe even a year or two in the future. But the business hasn't fundamentally altered in any way that I can see. They just had a bad year, and that happens to even the best fund managers who aren't composed of computer algorithms.

Anyway, I could of course be wrong in my assessment, but it does seem to me that a business worth between 3 and 10 billion pounds (as assessed by the market) is selling on the cheap side as it's had a bad year. Which is really quite nice for me, as I think it will do fine over the next decade or so, and currently looks cheap on that basis.

The point here, is that short-term myopia is the norm in investment circles and those chasing strong monthly performance for their funds. It just seems way easier to me to be picking up these things that are punished by the markets for having a bad quarter or year, but have not really changed their businesses recently and are still well managed, than to try and predict the unpredictable.

Focussing on what's important and knowable, rather than what is unimportant and unknowable is the way to make money, and yet so few people do it! Maybe it's a worthwhile process to try and predict the next gyration, but it seems better to me to try and think for oneself and remain rational. Better, but perhaps not particularly easy, and therefore quite a rare virtue to keep working towards.

On Having A Variant Perception

What a great term, ‘variant perception’. It sounds both straightforward and intelligent. The meaning is also both simple and profound. How does what I think differ from what everyone else is thinking?

Well, if you take a moment to consider it, you’re really not going to do particularly differently to the average if you lack a variant perception. Equally, it’s worth considering that the ‘crowd’ could very well be correct in their thinking, and by seeking to be contrarian too often, you may end up fighting against the tide.

What this whole Value Investing business boils down to is the attempt to find better-than average businesses at lower-than-average prices. Ideally you’ll find a superstar business at a price usually reserved for basket cases, but that may be a wish too far for most of your lifetime (incidentally these wishes were coming true for brave investors back in March 2009).

Well, having tried both the global macro approach to investing, and the value investing approach, it just seems to me far, far easier to have a useful insight and a ‘variant perception’ in the field of relatively simple-to-understand businesses (micro-economics) than in the field of enormously complex and difficult-to-understand global economies (macro-economics). Not to say that the latter is impossible, I just personally find it much, much harder most of the time.

Being a fairly simple soul, and thinking that results gained from less effort are superior to those gained via more effort, the value approach seems preferable to me over the alternatives. This is especially true with small sums of money to invest, however I can see how things would change as the pool of capital under management gets large enough to limit your investable options in the equity space.

Back to ideas and performance, as it’s the end of the year. Some mixed luck came my way on the 11th of December. HMS, spiked up in price on news of an all-cash bid taking place. The price went from 125p to 215p in the course of the morning, and has been gradually ticking up towards the 233p takeover price ever since. This sort of luck is something that I’m very happy to receive every once in a while, although it is somewhat mixed as the company would be worth far more if it could secure reasonable funding from the banks. In the absence of available credit, it makes sense for them to sell out to a well-financed entity, but the deal was struck at a lower price to the acquirer than I think the enterprise was worth.

Anyway, that provided a nice boost to the portfolio to end the year up 24.1% versus 27.6% for the FTSE 100 index with dividends reinvested. Since inception the portfolio is now up 80.3% versus 31.8% for the FTSE and 1.9% for the S+P. Over the past 3 years the portfolio is now up 52.7% against returns of -1.0% for the FTSE and -16.0% for the S+P, also with dividends reinvested. Long may the outperformance continue!

In terms of current ideas, I’m looking at a US stock that builds GPS units, called Garmin, Interior Services Group and Lo-q in the UK, as well as Velosi and a fair few others. I’ve also been screening for new ideas via the Company REFS service and via the Bloomberg system, which has produced a cacophony of stocks to research in more detail. I’ve been meeting a few hedge fund managers to hear how they invest and talk about my ideas with, as well as some potential investors.

Well, a new decade is here and it’s time to look ahead. Significant uncertainty is all around, but this is always true no matter what the talking heads or wisdom of crowds tells you. I’m very pleased to have kept a record of the past year as it could well prove to be one of the most instructive (and possibly constructive) 12 month periods in my life. Whatever happens next, I’m guessing my role will be far more in-line with my ideals than in the past, which is a pretty nice thing to be able to say about your outlook, even if it’s not a particularly variant perception.

Tomorrow, And Tomorrow, And Tomorrow

One of my favourite stock market quotes comes from the great American Financier (or robber barron, depending on your view) - J.P. Morgan. When asked what the stockmarket will do next, he responded that, "It will fluctuate." And that is about the most prescient answer anyone could ever give on the subject.

Anyway, investing isn't about peering into a crystal ball and seeing what will be. It's a search for opportunities where, on balance, the likely reward of an investment outweighs the potential risks. You can concentrate your risk in a few high-potential investments, or spread it over more ideas that collectively should give you less volatile returns. All this balancing of risks and rewards is a tricky business. This past week or two being a case in point.

One of my favourite stocks at the moment is a little minnow that I now have a reasonable amount of shares in called Lo-Q (ticker LOQ). From looking at the annual report, reading information on the internet, reading the available broker note, talking about the business with friends, thinking about the business lots and finally speaking to the founder on the phone recently, I have formed a strong view on the likely fair value of the business. And my valuation (around £40m) was just a little bit higher than the market cap of the company as quoted on AIM last week. Just a little bit being £30m higher (or a potential 300% rise from the current £10m market cap)!

Back in October I sold out of two business I thought it wasn't worth being in - Umeco and Severfield Rowen. They both seemed undervalued still but my other ideas just seemed better. Plus I was starting to really understand the concept that it's hard to think about more than, say, 6 ideas at once as I was having trouble thinking very deeply about the 11 ideas I had in my portfolio at the time. So I sold out of those two stocks in favour of Lo-Q and Staffline (ticker STAF).

Of course Umeco promptly rallied from 290p to 350p, which just reminds me (again) that my short-term market timing skills are rubbish to say the least. In consolation Staffline managed a 42% rally in November, which was nice.

So this LOQ then. At the end of the analysis I just saw a great, growth business with relatively few issues to derail growth over the next couple of years at least. And at 75% undervalued, a fairly compelling prospect. What to do. Hmm. I thought about selling out of the larger issues I have that are less undervalued (BRK.B at 20% and EMG now at 40%). Probably a good idea, but that's not how a balanced portfolio would look. And there's the rub.

If I'm managing this mini-portfolio with a view to showing others how I would manage their money one day that's one thing (and being somewhat diversified to reduce volatility and avoid potential value traps makes good sense). However, it is a little different to what I should be doing if I were just managing this tiny amount of capital with the very pure goal of maximising post-tax returns in mind.

Recently, it's begun to sink in that I'm going to struggle to get any sort of investment business underway without some fairly huge levels of confidence in me from a set of very well capitalised supporters. And the types of people who would back me would basically ask themselves, "If he's so good, why is he so poor?" Which ends up with the slightly tortuous conclusion that, to be in a position to manage money away from the crowds, I first have to have enough behind me so that I basically don't need to work. Well, if that's what it takes, then so be it.

There's some freedom in the above, though. I was fixated on making my portfolio work in a way that would be operationally viable with a much larger sum than I am currently managing. And the case in point, LOQ, is not something that anyone with decent sums of money could invest much in. If you're managing £100m or so and want to get a decent return, you've got to start looking at companies with market caps broadly in excess of £100m to avoid owning more of the company than you can get in and out of easily. Any smaller and you're going to end up owning such a large chunk that you'll move the price significantly on your way in and out, thus eliminating the potential profits that a smaller fund could benefit from.

Happily, mini-investors with the time and skills can look in this sub-£100m market cap universe and find a wealth (literally) of undervalued gems to put their money to work in. Frankly, it seems like a decent investor with small sums of money should be able to totally destroy the market averages by investing a concentrated portfolio in this universe of stocks, so that's where their attention (and mine while not working for anyone else and managing miniscule sums) should be focussed.

It's been a year since I started this blog now, so I may post less frequently from now on. Here's the current portfolio and performance since inception, as at 30 November 2009. Hopefully I'll be able to update the portfolio and performance and check back on how the likes of LOQ are progressing in the future. It's good to get ideas down before the event, and check back later to see how things are panning out. As Buffett says, "In the business world, the rearview mirror is always clearer than the windshield."

Portfolio

BRK.B - 19%

HMS - 18%

MTEC - 18%

LOQ - 12%

EMG - 11%

ISG - 9%

WMH - 6%

STAF - 6%

GMG - 5%

Returns

(Compound)

Since Inception 3 years 1 year

Portfolio 59.2% 38.4% 7.1%

FTSE 100 26.0% -2.4% 26.8%

S&P500 -0.3% -16.4% 26.7%

(Annualised)

Since Inception 3 years 1 year

Portfolio 10.3% 11.2% 7.1%

FTSE 100 5.0% -0.8% 26.8%

S&P500 -0.1% -5.8% 26.7%

Inception was on 10 March 2005. Portfolio returns are calculated after all costs (paying the spread, stamp duty and dealing costs) but uses the mid-price for current valuation purposes. Index returns assume dividends are reinvested and do not take any costs into account (meaning the actual returns from investing in such indexes would be lower).

A Bright Future

As the investor awoke from his deep slumber, the masks he had been trying on for size during his European sojourn fell away to reveal his true self. The sun was rising in the sky as he stretched his arms high above his head and his now expansive vision of what was to come filled his mind with wonder, excitement and no small degree of trepidation.

There is now a fairly unshakeable belief in me that I can outperform markets in general by a wide margin over time. That belief (and the expected outperformance) is large with small amounts of capital and shrinks with larger amounts. I think that most professional investors would say the same thing, but few probably have personal investment accounts that show they have been able to actually do this. Sadly, only a minority will have professional performances that beat the market averages over time - especially once fees are taken into account.

It may sound egotistical to say you are better than the professionals at an activity, especially one regarded as being so difficult to master, however, for the enlightened at least, the investment game is surprisingly simple and easy to outperform in. That is, before you take behavioural biases into account.

Plato once said, "For a man to conquer himself is the first and noblest of all victories." This couldn't be more prescient in the field of investment management. The only way I know to overcome the inevitable biases is to stick with one strategy and not be swayed by the emotions of the market. Whether or not this will be possible is entirely dependent on temperament. By understanding exactly why you should have an edge in investing, and checking each time you make an investment decision against a list of credentials for making investments, you can alleviate many of the biases that lead to poor performance.

The simple process of finding undervalued stocks may involve a vast amount of hard work, but happily this will neither feel hard or like work if you love what you are doing. You only need to sit and think carefully for half an hour or so on a given company to have an edge on many of the people who will end up buying or selling shares in that company's stock over the next few years. Some will be depressed at it's prospects and offer you very favourable terms to sell you shares in the enterprise at a low price, and some will be highly enthusiastic about the future for the company and willing to pay you a compellingly high price for a share in its expected future profits. It is the induced hope and fear of others that creates such rich opportunities for those with the right temperament, who are also willing to do a bit of work, to profit from their folly.

Sadly, many investors decide to invest for reasons other than a perceived gap between price and value. Exploiting the difference between the two is the lynchpin of the value investing process and has worked over and over again through a variety of markets and with clearly understandable and repeatable results (perhaps more in direction than in magnitude). That few appear drawn to the process seems odd, but when you factor in career risk for professionals and the extreme short-termism of many investors, it is more understandable.

So, opportunities abound for those able to be reasonable at assessing the fair value of businesses, and then exploiting the difference between price and value by buying where a sufficient margin of safety exists.

I look forward to a future where I will be able to help people invest more wisely. I look forward to a future where I can help people by compounding their capital at rates of return that will warm their hearts by helping them to meet their goals and fulfill their dreams. I look forward to a future where I will be able to think about investments all day long and teach others of the plentiful opportunities available in markets; to help them understand the mechanics of valuing businesses and profiting from the market's inevitable bouts of greed, fear and folly.

The road to this point has been rocky at times, and I've had to learn from mistakes that thankfully were never so large as to divert me from the path which I am still on. I will definitely seek out people who I feel I can learn from, but in the final analysis the real rewards of fulfillment and satisfaction will arrive as long as I can immerse myself in an activity I take real pleasure from, and by performing well in an activity that I, personally, attribute value to.

A New Dawn

The sun gradually pushed out a soft light across the dewy hills. As the shadows appeared, our protagonist stirred and shifted, awaking from a deep and restful slumber. To the east a ball of light hinted at its imminent arrival, haloed over the jagged peaks, spreading it's rays over the upper sky. Slowly, but steadily, the ball arose and the rays fell, in perfect harmony. Light shone on the investor who had been roused by the appearance of daybreak. A new day had arrived, and he intended to live it to the full.

Whatever has happened is in the past, and all you can do is look to making your future as bright as possible. I've always known that my future is as an investor and not a trader, so it's with some disappointment that I reflect on the past few years of excessive trading activity, where capital has been created and destroyed. But underneath the gross volatility of my trading activities I have been developing a knowledge and skill base that I am increasingly certain is one that will significantly outperform over time.

It's all about Value, it always has been and it always will be. But my investing hasn't always been intelligent. To have almost proved the maxim that with a bit of capital and a high IQ you can lose a great deal very fast isn't perhaps an achievement I need to reflect on too deeply (or indeed share too often), but I have to admit to my mistakes and learn from them. Perhaps slowly, but I have to learn.

So, out with the currency trading, out with bond futures, out with options, commodities trades and the like and out with equity index punts. In with VALUE INVESTING. The way it should be and the way it needs to be.

It will be a gradual shift, but the portfolio is formed now and I've finally made the analysis of my performance that I had meant to do for a long while. In short I've made 55.4% since March 2005 versus the FTSE being flat and the S+P down 12%. Not too shabby. The annualised return is 10.0% since March 2005, which I can live with. And here are the current stars of the portfolio...

1) Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) - 20%

The one and only. After the analysis is done I have this as a 25% discount to fair value, so a potential 33% upside if it achieves that fair value in the near future. But the return on equity from this fantastically well capitalised business is a not stellar 6.6%, although probably over 10% on a normalised basis (excluding 2008 losses on stocks and derivatives). 10% on $109bn - not bad, sir! Once the only stock in here, now maybe on its way out, think it will have to go if the discount narrows to 10% or so.

Everything from Insurance to t-shirts and prefabricated houses. A holding company for a fantastic collection of 100% owned businesses and shares in fantastic publicly traded companies, bought either at fair prices or a discount to fair prices. Over time this business will grow and grow and continue to produce prodigious amounts of cash. Succession risk prevents the stock from shooting upwards, but it has an excellent returns to sleep ratio to it!

2) Hallin Marine Subsea International (HMS) - 14%

My best idea currently. According to my estimates, this company is trading at a 51% discount to its fair value. It returned 65% on equity last year and is on a P/E of 2.65x last year's earnings despite a 30% run up in the stock prior to tomorrow's earnings announcements.

The more I think about the business, the more I like it. A great management team providing excellent service to a sector with lots of cash available doing things that are difficult to do and winning new business at a steady pace.

HMS provides subsea intervention equipment and teams to the oil and gas and telecommunications industries. A lot of their revenue is earned out of their Singaporean hub, where the economy is on a much sounder footing than here in Europe. Growth at the profits line has been 120% annualised over the past 4 years... yes, annualised! They have managed this by starting out small, but they are still pretty miniscule at a market cap of £56m - although I expect that will change markedly over the next few months.

3) Man Group (EMG) - 12%

An association with the Head of Research of AHL (the futures trading arm of the hedge fund group) first introduced me to this company. In an industry in turmoil and in need of consolidation, I believe these guys have what it takes to come out not only in one piece, but shining.

I have them at a not-quite-enough-to-be-buying-here 22% discount to fair value. But they are yielding 9% on a well covered dividend. That's 9% from what I regard as a solid business when I can get around 1% in a bank. Returns on Equity are over 10% still based on last year's earnings, which look unlikely to be repeated for a good while yet, but even with normalised earnings of a little under $1bn per year the stock's market cap of $8.4bn isn't what I would regard as expensive for what I do regard as a business with a good future.

When to sell will be a dilemma, but I think with such tiny sums of capital to invest at the moment it will be a case of finding new ideas to invest in before selling ideas that still show up as value investments in my mind.

For completeness, here are the other protagonists in my motley crew of investments. In order of the value within the portfolio...

4) Interior Services Group (ISG) - 12%

5) Matchtech (MTEC) - 12%

6) William Hill (WMH) - 7%

7) Game Group (GMG) - 7%

8) Lo-Q (LOQ) - 6%

9) Umeco (UMC) - 5%

10) Severfield Rowen (SFR) - 4%

11) Staffline (STAF) - 2%

The one idea that I am least happy with is Umeco, and may sell out of this stock soon enough. They provide supply chain outsourcing to the aerospace and defense markets (unexciting) and also manufacture composite materials for airlines, wind turbine blades and Formula 1 teams (exciting). But margins aren't all that wonderful and the return on equity is around 8.5% versus 20%+ in most of my other holdings with the exception of Man Group and Berkshire Hathaway.

At least it is up 20% on where I bought it less than a month ago (the market has been strong this Autumn), so the discount has narrowed and the reasons for buying the stock have diminished somewhat. That leaves a question of what to do with the funds once the stock has been sold. There's not much bad news knocking about in my favourite stocks, so I'll probably add to the holdings in Lo-Q, which could be a fantastic investment, but it's hard to see if the business model is truly sustainable.

So, a new dawn has arisen in this investors outlook. I'm going back to London for work, but my heart will stay in the mountains. And my dreams of running a fund are still in tact, as you can probably see from the above. The counter on this blog has been ticking upwards recently, and I'm not sure exactly who is reading this, so if you have anything to add, please comment below and be as open as possible. Feel free to spread the word if you find anything useful here also - anyone buying my investments will only push the prices up and I'm pretty much fully invested now, so that's ok with me!

The true test starts now though, as my portfolio did not fully exemplify my value philosophy before the recent additions in August. I'm very pleased to have made such good returns in the past, but really it's 20% a year in good years and to not lose too much in bad years that I'm shooting for. Then again, with 2008 such a disaster for most investors, I think I have the right to feel pretty good about a 50% plus gain over a period when the FTSE has ended up where it started.